Local Government System
of Pakistan
Written by Mughiza Imtiaz
Pakistan
is a federal parliamentary republic state where the provincial government enjoys
more autonomy and residuary power as compared to the central government. Executive
powers lie with the national government headed by PM, who works consistently
work with bicameral legislature as well as judicature. Provinces are divided
into districts known as Zillas. A Zilla is subdivided into Tehsils. Tehsils
contain towns/municipalities. Panchayat Raj System is not new here, as it was
introduced by the British during the colonial era. The practice of adopting federalism
is different from both India and Pakistan.
The main difference is that Pakistan is the only country
with an urban framework, as well, in the region today; and Pakistan's system
has a common-representational framework between tiers and, it has a bottom-up depictive a framework like the Canadian example. Pakistan had the only three-tier system as
integrated bottom-up, common-representational, local government system, until
it was adapted for another country in 2003.
Since 2001, the majority of these have been led by
democratically elected local councils, each headed by a Nazim (mayor
or supervisor.) Council elections are held every four years.
Through decentralization, local governments lessen delays in
public service delivery. It also safeguards equitable distribution of
resources, promotes a sense of local ownership among people, mobilizes resources
among the community for development, ensures accountability and responsiveness, and
helps in the consolidation of federalism and national integration. These features of
local government help in the democratization of state and society and prove as
an asset of nation-building. Under 140-A Article of the Pakistani constitution binds
the provinces to establish a sustainable and purposeful local government, to
federalize political, administrative, and financial concern and authority to the
elected representative of local government.
Article 32 of 1973, the constitution stated that the state shall encourage the local government of elected
representatives, while Article 47 discussed that the state will sponsor social
injustices and eliminate social evils through decentralized governance. However,
the provincial government incessantly
snubbing these constitutional compulsions with liberty. Sadly, the local government
system of Pakistan has been loathing to the bureaucratic and political elites.PTI
government has come up with a local government system which is totally against
devolution and empowerment.
In 2013, The alliance of
PTI with JI launch a bold law and establish a local setup which is more close
to devolution and provisions of Articles 32,37 and 140-A of the 1973 constitution.
Under the Local Government Act of 2013, three-tier systems were established in all
districts of the provinces; initially, with 24 devolved departments which were
later to some extent reduced, the district government was accountable for the
provision of social services. The tehsil tier was entrusted with the
responsibility of municipal services. The distinctive feature was the
substitute of the union council with the village council. This Act provided fiscal
autonomy to all the three tiers by allocating a substantial amount of money.
By keeping in view all
the factors (revenue collection, population, poverty, and infrastructure) 30% of
the total development expenses would be given to local governments through
provincial finance commission. 70 billion rupees was transferred to the local the government in four years, this amount was roughly half of the due share of
the local bodies which were not shared.
To control the
malpractices in election district and tehsil nazims in the 2001 system was observed
and tehsil council and district council were declared as electoral colleges in
a transparent manner.
This credit goes to PTI
for introducing as a flagship project of transparency and used it for public
mobilization in its favor before and during the 2018 elections. PTI government took
a big policy shift by incorporating certain fundamental amendments. This
amended Act against the spirit of devolution and the 1973 constitution. The district tier has been abolished but at the same time district administration
retained as a unit.
The tehsil tier is
mandated to look after municipal and social services but the devolved
departments at the tehsil level would be reporting the district administration.
The tehsil mayor is helpless in front of the district administration and there
would be a tug of war between both administrations as an outcome poor service delivery.
The removal of the chairperson of the village council and mayor of tehsil through impeachment rather than a vote of no
confidence.
The head of the council would
prepare a budget and send it to the local government commission for final approval. The direct election of tehsil mayor on a party basis is a great step but again the
member of the council consisting of the village council would be on a non-party basis.
The dichotomy of electing the mayor on a party basis with a council consisting
of members elected on a non-party basis will sponsor horse-trading at the grassroots level.
Chief Minister can ask
the chair of the village council or the tehsil chair /city mayor to carry out
certain tasks, and if the leader of the concerned tier fails to act in
accordance with, the CM can direct the district administration to hold these
functions. This condition would critically hinder the function of elected local
government and imperil the devolution of power.
In spite of making the
existed local system better the substantial amendments in Local Government Act-2013
damaged the devolution and rasped the administrative and fiscal autonomy of the
local government. It is departing to invalidate the impetus of reforms and
gains of Local Government Act-2013. The three local governments have effectively
accomplished their tenure and now the provinces are ready for other reforms.
The need of the hour is to
renovate the more powers of district tier, remove the fiscal power of local bodies, and make them free from the control of bureaucracy.
To make the transparent
and efficient election system of local bodies there is a dire need of
constitutional provision which makes it mandatory to have 3 tiers of local
government and avoid the delayed process of the election within 90 days after its
completion of tenure.
1 Comments
It's can not be implemented
ReplyDeleteHy!
Thanks for your replying and showing interest in my blog.